Washington’s Missile Depletion Gamble Meets Iran’s Survival Strategy, Sending Oil Risk Higher as Bitcoin Finds a Floor
Digital Asset Market: Bitcoin’s dip below $70,000 in the last 24 hours triggered heavy accumulation, with nearly 600,000 BTC bought in the nearby lower trading band and over 200,000 BTC added in the past two weeks, lifting coins last moved in that zone to about 8% of circulating supply and potentially strengthening it as support; bitcoin has since rebounded into an area with thinner prior trading, while Checkonchain estimates roughly 60% of supply remains in profit, implying about 40% of holders have a higher cost basis. Separately, Michael Saylor’s Strategy added about 18,000 BTC in a roughly $1.3B purchase, taking total holdings to around 739,000 BTC, or about 3.7% of the circulating supply, with the buy also highlighted as larger than several weeks of newly mined supply.
Macroeconomics: Saudi Aramco CEO Amin Nasser is warning that the escalating Iran war and the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a route for about one-fifth of global oil flows, could produce severe and widening economic damage if disruptions persist. He argues the shock is already propagating through shipping and insurance into aviation, agriculture, automotive, and other industrial supply chains, while Aramco tries to reroute barrels via the East-West pipeline to the Red Sea, which has a capacity of nearly 7 million barrels per day but cannot fully replace normal Gulf export routes. Reuters also reports Aramco has started cutting output at two fields, and several regional producers and refiners have reduced production or declared force majeure, tightening physical supply and driving sharp price volatility with Brent reaching peaks near 120 dollars. From a global macro perspective, this functions as a negative supply shock that can reaccelerate inflation, weaken real household incomes and consumption, pressure corporate margins in energy-intensive sectors, and complicate central bank decisions by forcing a tradeoff between growth and inflation, while also increasing risk premia across currencies, credit, and equities, particularly in oil-importing economies.
Equities: U.S. stocks slipped early Tuesday as investors weighed conflicting signals on the Iran conflict: President Trump hinted the war could end soon, but Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu and U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth indicated operations would continue, and reports of an oil tanker explosion near Abu Dhabi further clouded the outlook. Later in the morning, the market recovered, with major indexes roughly flat on the day. Oil prices, which dropped sharply late Monday on hopes of limited disruption, stayed volatile but remained lower, with traders focused on whether tensions could threaten shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Markets are also looking ahead to key inflation releases this week (CPI on Wednesday and PCE on Friday) and notable earnings, including Oracle after Tuesday’s close and Adobe later in the week. However, the timeline of a potential ceasefire is the driving factor right now.
The Fed and US Treasury: Rising oil prices after the U.S. Iran war could cancel much of the consumer boost expected from Trump’s “big beautiful bill” by pushing households to spend a similar amount of money on gasoline as they receive in tax cuts and refunds. Raymond James estimates that if oil stays more than about 20 dollars a barrel above pre-war levels, consumers could spend roughly 150 billion dollars more at the pump, near the Tax Foundation’s estimate of 129 billion dollars of 2025 individual tax cuts, mostly arriving via refunds. From an inflation and Fed rate-cutting perspective, sustained higher energy prices would lift headline inflation and squeeze real spending, making the Fed more cautious and potentially delaying or reducing the pace of rate cuts until it sees the shock fading. If the oil spike proves short-lived, or if prices do not remain elevated for long enough as Wolfe suggests may require levels above 100 dollars for a period, the Fed could still move toward gradual cuts as core inflation cools, with tax refunds helping consumers absorb some of the energy hit rather than driving a new inflation wave.
Geopolitical: Oil prices had pared earlier overnight losses, and stock index futures were weak going into the United States cash open, but sentiment shifted after renewed statements from G7 officials and the International Energy Agency signaled that a coordinated release from strategic petroleum reserves could be imminent. IEA head Fatih Birol said market conditions had deteriorated due to risks around the Strait of Hormuz and significant production curtailments, prompting him to call an extraordinary meeting of member governments to assess whether to release emergency stocks, which total more than 1.2 billion barrels publicly plus additional industry stocks. Crude then fell back to session lows and equities rose, though options markets still price more upside risk for WTI, reflecting concern that disruptions could persist and that an SPR release may be blocked by countries with already low reserves, in which case oil could quickly rebound if the meeting produces only rhetoric rather than action.
View from our desk
Bitcoin Shifts From Purge to Build as Spot Demand Firms Below $70K
Last week, we argued Bitcoin was unlikely to sit near $68K for long. The path was binary: either a renewed move higher as adoption and liquidity pulled in incremental buyers, or a sharper reset as leverage and “guaranteed trade” positioning got fully washed out. What price action now suggests is that the more constructive path is gaining traction. Yesterday’s brief move below $70K looked less like fresh capitulation and more like redistribution, with meaningful spot demand stepping in below that level and helping establish a more credible cost-basis floor. That matters because once an area begins to attract real cash buyers rather than forced positioning, markets often become far more resilient on retests.
Just as important, a $70K reclaim appears to leave less-obvious overhead supply immediately above current levels, which can make any rebound more reflexive than many expect. A large share of holders also remain underwater on positions established above $70K, reinforcing the view that a meaningful leverage washout has already occurred. That does not eliminate macro-driven volatility, and Bitcoin remains highly sensitive to rates, liquidity, and broader risk sentiment. But the combination of persistent dip buying, a developing support shelf, and thinner supply overhead is improving the near-term risk-reward profile.
Our read is that the market is moving from purge to build. That does not mean a straight line higher, and it does not mean downside risk has disappeared. It means the tape's character is changing. Instead of looking like a market still searching for its liquidation point, Bitcoin increasingly looks like one rebuilding ownership in stronger hands, with price beginning to stabilize around levels where conviction buyers are willing to absorb supply.
Iran Bets on Endurance as Washington and Jerusalem Test Missile Depletion
Iran appears to be pursuing a war of endurance rather than a clean military victory, aiming to outlast the United States and Israel by extending the conflict, sustaining missile and drone pressure, and threatening enough disruption to energy markets and regional stability to test political tolerance in Washington. Despite major strikes and visible losses, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps remains firmly in control of strategy and escalation, while also consolidating power internally. Rather than signaling fracture, the conflict so far appears to have reinforced central control, with Tehran leaning into a model built around attrition, economic disruption, and survival.
The central question is no longer whether Iran has taken damage. It clearly has. The real question is whether it retains enough launch capacity, command cohesion, and domestic control to keep the campaign going for weeks rather than days. U.S. officials argue that large parts of its arsenal have been degraded, while other estimates suggest a more meaningful reserve remains. That gap matters because this conflict is now as much about inventory, endurance, and political staying power as it is about battlefield outcomes. Tehran’s apparent calculation is that if it can continue firing, keep pressure on Gulf shipping and energy sentiment, and avoid internal collapse, it can still frame survival itself as strategic success.
Inside Iran, authorities are shifting further toward a war economy and tighter IRGC-led control, while signs of meaningful elite fracture or domestic unrest remain limited. In fact, external bombardment may be strengthening national solidarity at the margin rather than weakening regime control. This is becoming a dual endurance test: whether Iran can sustain attacks long enough to remain disruptive, and whether the United States and Israel can absorb the mounting economic, military, and political costs of a drawn-out conflict. Tehran does not need a decisive battlefield win for its strategy to work. It only needs to endure long enough to raise the cost of forcing it to yield.
Happy Trading!
The 1Konto Team
About 1Konto
1Konto powers institutional finance with a unified platform for trading, settlement, and credit across stablecoins, fiat, and digital assets. Through 1KPrime, clients gain access to deep liquidity, real-time cross-border settlement, and integrated Bitcoin-backed credit facilities, all supported by trusted custody infrastructure. From treasury management to automated capital deployment, 1Konto enables the next generation of global financial operations with the security, efficiency, and transparency institutions require.
Contact us today to learn how we can support your trading, settlement, and capital needs.
Not Financial Advice Disclaimer